Locks Park is thought by some to be rather special. When visiting ecologists, environmentalists and conservationists ooh and ahh over our flower-filled meadows, the butterflies, birds and bees, the richness and diversity of the wildlife, hedgerows and pastures I feel privileged to live and farm such a piece of land. But I’m also made to feel culpable. When completing the infamous Higher Level Stewardship application I was brought to task over keeping sheep and ‘lost points’ as this is considered detrimental to the wildlife.
‘Bbbut’ I stammered ‘Sheep are good little farmers. They aerate the soils, break open rush clumps, encourage other plant species. Mixed grazing is important for many reasons too. And …’
I was cut short. Sheep, I was informed, eat flowers, so are unwelcome.
I also have too many cattle. More points lost. What about replenishing nutrients in depleted soils, sensitively of course, as in dung spreading and liming? Frowned upon.
I’m told that farms like this have always been subsistence farms. Minimal stock was kept, I mean just look at the buildings. Proves a point really.
I scratched my head and thought ‘I wonder. I’ll ask Elli’. Elli is the daughter of the couple we bought the farm from eighteen years ago. Elli is enthusiastic and a keen member of the community. Athletic, up before the crack of dawn and when not working all god’s hours she’s often seen cycling up three-in-one hills with her graceful dog Mel beside her. Her father, George, came to Locks Park when he was a small boy of six and seamlessly took over farming it from his father and mother when they retired. Elli has a deep affinity for the place. She remembers well the stories her grandparents and father told of their lives here. She reminisces on those fabled forever, long hot summers and winters of snow and icicles. Helping out on the farm throughout her childhood she continued even after she’d left and married running her sheep on the Rutleighs. She loves the place and I believe if circumstances had been different she would have gladly taken over from her parents.
I knew she would know exactly what was farmed here and how – it’s part of her very being, her core. “Well now, twenty-five to thirty milking cows. They were up at the house and in all winter. Followers, young stock and the like: we wintered them out on the bottom of Scadsbury. Never in. Again twenty-five to thirty. You know max, Paula.”
the out-wintering land, Scadsbury meadow
Scadsbury was forty acres of rented land. Land, unfortunately, we never managed to acquire, and the out-wintering field she was talking about is the most glorious ten acres of flower-filled culm.
“The cows were grazed at home on Top, Flop, Little Hill, Five Acres, Dung and Rushy. Followers continued over at Scadsbury, you know, when the grass came on in the better fields.”
She went on to say they never brought in any forage, cutting it all at Locks. Fertiliser, 20-10-10, was applied, sparingly of course, as well as lime and slag when needed.
“Even on Dillings?” I chip in. Dillings being our ultra special flower filled meadow.
“Yes, yes, of course.”
They used to bale up rushes for bedding and she can’t remember them ever buying in straw. “Nothing was ever tilled at Locks, too wet, not even in the war. Yes, I know I’m right, though I think they once did a small piece over Scadsbury and we must’ve baled that as straw.”
And sheep? “Oh, eighty ewes give or take.”’
So who’s right? These small, beautiful, diverse farms were working, commercial farms. We’ve been left a legacy that no money can create. Should we now treat their land as museum pieces – to be polished and treated with kid gloves, or should we too work them to provide food and income, allowing them to reflect the character of our age, not ages past?
An afterthought. I believe I’m trying to express my idea of what I feel is wondrous and astonishing. So let me try and find an analogy. To me true beauty in a human has nothing to do with the plastic nip and tucked, contrived, gleaming and polished doll-like exterior we are apparently meant to aspire to in today’s consumer-driven/celebrity-culture existence. True beauty is an extraordinary mix of the physical and metaphysical, the body and soul to use a well worn phrase. A magnetic pull towards a radiating working energy. Not a self-serving manufactured appearance deprived of age or history. So if you can translate these clumsy thought images to farms (the physical) and nature (the spirit) maybe you’ll have an inkling of what I’m trying to express.
flowers in Dillings





17 comments
Comments feed for this article
May 11, 2008 at 9:59 am
mary
What a nightmare Paula. I was just looking at the DEFRA site http://www.defra.gov.uk/erdp/schemes/es/default.htm about ERDP -Environmental Stewardship, DEFRA being the Government Dept. that masterminded last year’s FMD outbreak and before that the scandalous fiasco of the Rural Payments agency.
I found it hard to understand and wonder whether you could tell us (briefly) what the benefits to a farmer and the environment are and what it replaces in terms of subsidies etc. I assume that it emanated from the EU.
I thought it very funny that there is a photo on the page that could have come straight from Locks Park Farm being very similar to yours above with the orchids.
May 11, 2008 at 10:52 pm
Mopsa
Paula - I was all ready to go to bed and now you’ve written something like this it’s woken me right up again!
I can’t believe that it’s good to make working land a museum piece; surely we should still be working it as sympathetically as possible to maintain its value (I’m not talking £’s here), whilst making a living from it too (yes, £’s in this case). Surely we don’t want a situation where you have to be rich rich rich to farm (getting poorer in the process), striding occasionally and tentatively (mind the orchid) across empty meadows?
If Elli’s family made it work, and you have continued the tradition, and have more orchids etc than you can shake a stick at, who in their right minds would speak against your modus operandi?
Your HLS experience has been so different from mine, it seems very very unfair. No-one said our sheep were bad - in fact, being a native breed, like yours, they were distinctly good!
May 12, 2008 at 9:26 am
Gill
Sorry, I know I’ve asked this before, but would you mind telling me again what camera you use. Mine’s just conked out and I am bamboozled by all the technical descriptions of new cameras. All I know is that I’d like to take photos like yours
May 12, 2008 at 1:22 pm
paula
I’ll check my facts and come back to you Mary with what the government thinks the schemes deliver- and what I think!
Yes, rather strange they’re promoting diverse herb rich meadows when apparently we have nothing that’s of any interest.
May 12, 2008 at 1:27 pm
paula
Absolutely mopsa.
And guess what there is a huge under spend - millions in fact. There’s panic to get this apportioned out in the next few weeks. Who’s benefiting? Yes, it’s those large rich farms in the East once more. We, and many other small farms like us, have been told we’re really just not up to much (read here - too much fiddly administration)! Shame…try a bit harder. We might not be around for much longer though.
May 12, 2008 at 1:35 pm
paula
It’s a Sony Cybershot 7.2 bought in the Amazon sale, Gill. As I mentioned I’d never taken photos before the blog. I left it to Robert. But needs be as needs must, or whatever the saying is.
When I’m brave I occasionally use Robert’s - a Canon Powershot S5 IS. It’s has a far more powerful zoom and a fold out screen which is useful for on the ground stuff.
If you’re a photographer I’d probably go for Robert’s one. You can do more fiddling and things.
May 12, 2008 at 2:49 pm
Gill
Thanks Paula!
May 12, 2008 at 8:24 pm
Jane
I seem to be reading articles on this subject all over the place at the moment. Today I received my Wildlife magazine and what’s one of the articles? “our expanding world population needs feeding, but there are ways of producing more food without ploughing up our remaining wild land”. Quite an interesting column about forest farming in northern Europe.
Oh hell Paula I don’t know the answer…. I guess you just carry on doing what “feels right” what more can you do? If you did exactly what “everyone” wanted you would be pulled into a dozen parts and wouldn’t have a farm at the end of it.
Farming with wildlife in mind will obviously become harder and harder the more financial pressures you get… but I’m sure you will know what is the right way for YOU. If/when it gets to a time when it doesn’t work financially then I guess you have to stop… and although I hope this doesn’t happen it is obviously already getting harder and harder to keep the balance.
Sorry for being doom and gloom. Looking at the countryside this spring everything seems to be bursting with extra life and vitality. What a sad sad place it would be without butter coloured cowslips and early orchids…
May 13, 2008 at 7:33 am
Mopsa
Paula - did you mean to include a link to an article? dont think it worked, but would like to read it!
May 13, 2008 at 4:14 pm
mary
Mopsa when I clicked on ‘Higher Level Stewardship’ in Paula’s first para this cpmes up. Is that what you meant?
http://locksparkfarm.wordpress.com/2007/05/27/rhetoric-or-reality-part-1-hls-higher-level-stewardship/
May 13, 2008 at 9:09 pm
paula
Yup - doom and gloom can be shoved in the bin for another day I think Jane - it’s far too beautiful to get het up about things we probably can do nothing about!
May 13, 2008 at 9:10 pm
paula
Was it Jane’s article mopsa - or did I mention another one?
May 14, 2008 at 10:16 am
Mopsa
Sorry to confuse, Paula - I thought in your comment above about the huge HLS underspend there was meant to be a link for “(read here - too much fiddly administration)?
May 14, 2008 at 10:21 am
Mopsa
but now I realise you were explaining that it meant there was too much admin. I’m the thick one.
May 14, 2008 at 12:00 pm
paula
Not at all - I can sometimes look at something I’ve written and for some reason I just read it wrong - it doesn’t make sense at all.
Here I meant that they are looking for very large agreements that may not deliver but are easily administered - a sorry state of affairs as the farms missing out probably won’t survive.
June 21, 2008 at 7:54 pm
Rachel M.
Hi Paula,
I am a mature geography student at the University of Central Lancashire. I have decided to do my dissertation on farmers who are unable (or unwilling) to get on to the HLS scheme. I am writing to enquire as to whether you have been accepted on to the HLS scheme since this posting and if not, I wondered whether you would consider being part of my research - by way of interview.
I know of a number of farmers and conservation organisations in this neck of the woods who are been unsuccessful to date and they are most frustrated with things the way they are. I would like to think that research such as mine, will at least highlight a problem which needs to be resolved to those in the position of influencing policy.
Many thanks for taking the trouble to read this.
All the best,
Rachel Middleton
June 21, 2008 at 7:57 pm
Rachel M.
Sorry Paula, Further to my previous email, my email is: admin@risingseven.com.